[Statement] Regarding the Results of the Temporary Shareholders' Meeting of Korea Zinc
Date 2025.01.24
'Korea Zinc's Extraordinary General Meeting Advocating
'Minority
Shareholder Rights Protection'
—Was It Actually Meant to Protect Chairman
Choi Yoon-beom,
Who Holds Only a Minority Stake?
-
The majority shareholder lost their voting rights during the extraordinary
general meeting they initiated.
- This is an anti-capitalistic behavior that thoroughly deceived shareholders and the capital market.
- The results of the extraordinary general meeting, filled with illegal and unlawful practices, are deemed completely invalid, and those responsible will be held accountable.
In the extraordinary general meeting of Korea Zinc held on
the 23rd, which was called by the majority shareholder to improve the company's
distorted governance, an unbelievable event occurred in the South Korean
capital market: the majority shareholder’s voting rights were taken away due to
illegal and unlawful actions.
Korea Zinc's Chairman Choi Yoon-beom, upon receiving a
court ruling that the election of directors through a cumulative voting system
was illegal, realized that defending management rights through legal and
legitimate means would be difficult. As a result, they hastily devised an
illegal 'cross-shareholding' scheme that violated the law to unjustly block the
majority shareholder’s right to vote.
Chairman Choi Yoon-beom’s side transferred the shares
previously held by the Choi family in Young poong to Sun Metal Corporation
(SMC), a fully owned subsidiary of Korea Zinc in Australia, creating a loop of
shareholding between different companies. They argued that the 'mutual
shareholding restriction' applied and used this to take away the voting rights
of Young poong, the majority shareholder, during the extraordinary general
meeting.
However, SMC is a foreign corporation and a limited
company, so the voting rights restrictions under the Commercial Act do not
apply.
Using such a tactic to limit the majority shareholder’s
voting rights is widely seen by the legal community as going against the intent
of the 'mutual shareholding restriction' outlined in Korean commercial law.
There is also a dominant opinion that this approach contradicts the fundamental
principles of capitalism, which aim to protect the management rights of major
shareholders.
Furthermore, Chairman Choi’s use of the foreign company
SMC to bypass the regulations on cross-shareholding and circular shareholding
under the Fair Trade Act, while arguing that Korean commercial law should apply
to SMC, is not only self-contradictory but also directly contradicts the
purpose of the Fair Trade Act, which prohibits cross-shareholding and circular
shareholding.
Ultimately, Chairman Choi Yoon-beom's side attempting to
defend management rights by taking advantage of the 'mutual
shareholding restriction' system is an anti-capitalistic and reckless behavior
that thoroughly deceives shareholders and the capital market.
As a result, the series of actions—following Korea Zinc's
stock buyback, withdrawal of the capital increase, and now the illegal circular
shareholding—clearly show that the intention was not to protect minority
shareholders' rights, but to secure the position of Chairman Choi, who holds
only a minority stake.
The events of this extraordinary general meeting have made
it even clearer that Young poong, the majority shareholder of Korea Zinc, and
MBK Partners must strengthen their control over the company in order to achieve
governance improvements.
The results of this extraordinary general meeting of Korea Zinc, marked by various illegal and unlawful actions, are completely null and void. Young poong and MBK Partners will hold Korea Zinc and its current management accountable for thoroughly deceiving shareholders and the South Korean capital market, as well as for engaging in illegal and unlawful conduct.
Young Poong Corporation